The telecom industry is adjusting to a significant shift. The widely used Perimeta Session Border Controller (SBC), formerly part of a broader network solutions portfolio, has changed ownership. With the new vendor focusing on cloud-first delivery, many communication service providers (CSPs) are left reevaluating their SBC strategies.
For CSPs with deeply embedded Perimeta systems, this shift creates real questions around deployment flexibility, security, and long-term product support. Understanding the implications is the first step toward building a more resilient SBC strategy.
What’s Changing for CSPs
Perimeta SBCs have been a staple, especially among Tier 2 and Tier 3 operators. These deployments often support mission-critical functions tied to interconnect, IMS, and VoLTE services.
The change in ownership brings a new direction. The acquiring company’s model focuses on, subscription-based SaaS services. While this works for some, it poses challenges for providers who rely on on-premises or hybrid models to meet regulatory requirements or maintain direct control over infrastructure.
What was once a predictable part of the network stack now feels uncertain. And for CSPs, uncertainty at the SBC layer can affect network integrity, compliance, and scalability.
What’s at Risk
One of the first concerns is deployment flexibility. Providers that rely on choosing between on-prem, hybrid, or cloud configurations may find their options limited under a cloud-only approach.
Security is another critical area. SBCs need consistent patching and proactive support to guard against evolving threats. A shift in vendor focus could mean slower updates, less responsiveness, and potential gaps in protection.
There’s also the question of future-readiness. If the new product roadmap moves away from core telecom functions and toward enterprise voice markets, CSPs could be left without the tools needed to scale toward 5G or maintain IMS continuity.
How CSPs Can Respond
Instead of waiting for issues to surface, this is the time for CSPs to step back and assess their SBC environment. Consider whether your current platform still fits the needs of your network, both now and in the future.
Look at deployment models. Do you have the freedom to choose what works best for your infrastructure strategy?
Examine how security is handled. Is your vendor still committed to regular updates and compliance support?
Evaluate the roadmap. Are telecom use cases like VoLTE and 5G still a priority?
These questions help determine whether to stay the course or begin planning for a migration.
Planning the Way Forward
A thoughtful migration doesn’t happen overnight. Start with a clear understanding of your current state. Identify any gaps in flexibility, security, or scalability.
From there, align your future network goals with a vendor that prioritizes telecom-grade capabilities and supports multiple deployment approaches. Choosing a platform that is built for long-term evolution, not just enterprise needs, is critical.
Solutions like Enghouse BorderNet SBC are designed with these requirements in mind. While each provider’s situation is different, selecting a vendor committed to security, compliance, and ongoing telecom support ensures stability in the years ahead.
Learn More
This moment isn’t just about a product changing hands. It’s a signal to reassess the foundational components of the network. For CSPs, the right SBC strategy can mean the difference between being prepared for the future or caught off-guard by it.
Proactive planning now helps reduce long-term risk, strengthens network resilience, and keeps telecom services aligned with shifting industry demands.
Download the SBC Migration Guide to explore evaluation frameworks, readiness checklists, and expert insights to help protect your network and support growth.
